Looking Back Friday – Full Metal Jacket (1987)
For this weeks looking back article, Sam is here to talk about the Stanley Kubrick Vietnam classic, Full Metal Jacket
The Vietnam War has been the subject of many films. Whether it’s Francis Ford Coppola’s acclaimed Apocalypse Now (1979) or Oliver Stone’s brutally honest Platoon (1986), it’s a topic of conversation that has been thoroughly explored. That didn’t stop reclusive director Stanley Kubrick from making Full Metal Jacket (1987), his first film in seven years after The Shining (1980).
Told in two parts, Kubrick’s film opens with young men getting their hair cut. It’s a requirement to join the U.S. Marines. They’re headed to Parris Island or as any mentally functioning person would call it, Hell. This “island” is a training ground ran by Sergeant Hartman (R. Lee Ermey) – an equally vile and humorous officer who busts the balls of every maggot who wants to themselves Marines.
The opening is pure genius: Perplexing, saddening, and sporadically hilarious, Kubrick’s depiction of wartime preparation – filled with angst and uncertainty – is captured with fierce intensity. This is especially true in the character of Gomer Pyle (Vincent D’Onofrio) – an initially good-natured individual who is driven insane by bootcamp. The result is catastrophic. Neither the maker, nor player survives.
And as quickly as a philosophical element concludes, a new story begins. The film jumps ahead in time when Private “Joker” Davis (A character introduced at Parris Island played by Matthew Modine) is a journalist in the midst of war. At this point., the American public is feeling restless and frustrated over Vietnam. No one wants to fight in a useless war. Worse, no soldier wants to engage in warfare not worth losing life over.
Still, Joker is caught in the middle of it all. His job as a journalist for the Marines is to qualify, embellish, and spin wartime stories. This type of narrative structure – cutting the film into two distinct acts – is awfully similar to the techniques employed by Alfred Hitchcock in Vertigo. Both pictures contain a certain spirit: cold and distant, relentless and enigmatic.
While the master of suspense concocts a more elaborate film, Full Metal Jacket is an achievement in its own right. That feat is Kubrick’s ability to spin a rundown subject matter and create a fresh tale. By 1987, audiences had fallen head over heels for Apocalypse Now and Platoon, and then Full Metal Jacket is released. And once again, the style of Kubrick was reborn.
On a personal level, narratives detailing war often rings false and overbearing to me. This could be because of my complete and total disdain for bloodshed. However, my dislike for the conceit of battle is not the issue with Kubrick’s 12thfilm.
The preceding act is superior to the latter. Blending typical combatant training sequences, dark comedy, and philosophy, Full Metal Jacket could’ve adequately concluded after the first hour. It’s unfortunate that the subsequent act follows down the path of nearly every conventional war movie. Except for, of course, an inane use of a Mickey Mouse song.
Full Metal Jacket leaves me conflicted. Like the war itself, Kubrick’s 1987 feature is grim and inhuman, questioning the very reason why one partakes in the murdering of others.
About The Author – Sam Fragoso






Saw this last year for the first time. Excellent review and I completely agree that the first half is the best part of the movie. It actually is the one I remember most, although I must say that when they are pinned down it was a very tense to watch. I also hadn’t recognised Vincent D’Onofrio as he put on so much weight for the role.
I’m just shocked that D’Onofrio could produce such a riveting performance in general. He’s done nothing that I’ve seen that would lead me to believe he had such talent.
Sam is writing for Frontroom? I had no idea. I watched this movie as it came out, but tbh it melts together with all the other Vietnamn movies from about the same time into a blur of jungles, napalm, drugs and death. It was probably good.
Suddenly I realize that Sam probably wasn’t even born when the film came out. It makes me feel indredibly old.
HAHA Yeah he does the odd bit for me!! He gets about huh Jessica?
It is OK we can feel old together
Hey!
The movie was only created 7 years before I was born.
Thanks for reading Jessica.
I agree that the first half is better than the second but overall this is a great anti-war movie from one of the great filmmakers. It captures the senselessness of conflict almost perfectly.
I think PLATOON captures that “senselessness” with more prowess and emotion.
Seen this several times. It is a wonderful film and Kubrick is THE master of everything. Such a meticulous filmmaker.
I haven’t seen enough of Kubrick … but he’s certainly meticulous.
Hi, Sam and company:
Excellent dissertation on a favorite of mine!
I was wrapped up in this films mystique long before Kubrick bought the rights to Gustav Hasford’s slender, quick read, ‘The Short Timers’.
Was mightily impressed with Kubrick’s ability to have parts of the UK fill in for Parris Island and Hue City. His use of Westand helicopters was a nice touch, too. My only disappointment is that the novel’s last chapter id missing from the film.
Where Joker gets orders to join the Lust hog Squad at Khe Sanh and their morning patrol walks into a deadly ambush.
R. Lee Ermey was robbed of an Oscar nomination for his role as D.I. Gunny Hartman. A role originally given to Bruce Willis. Though lateraled to Ermey after Willis left, due to ‘Artistic Differences’.
Still prefer ‘Full Metal Jacket’ to either ‘Platoon’ and ‘Apocalypse Now’.
I re-watched this not very long ago- and my first watch was almost 20 years prior. I couldn’t believe how impressive it was.
Any feelings change the second time around?
Love Full Metal Jacket, it never gets old after countless watches. It is essentially two films and ilke everyone has said the first half is the best.
I just love the whole film in general.
I’m glad you’ve stuck to your own personal, initial thoughts,
Nice post, I think I liked this film a bit more than you did. However, that could be that I am a big fan of war films in general. Not that I enjoy bloodshed, well unless its via my xbox or a film. Lots of memorable lines of dialoge in this film.
I found this film very interesting. Although the elements that stick with me more are the basic training scenes (as alluded to above). Once we are in Vietnam, my recollection becomes a little hazy of what transpires.
I am always left fascinated by the sterility and coldness in many of Kubrick’s films and this film is no exception.
It seems a lot of folks are “hazy” over the crucial plot details.
I think everyone needs to give the film a re-watch … including myself.
Thanks for reading Adam – keep up the good work on your site.
Yeah another agreement on the second half. Definitely not nearly as good as the training stuff. Ermey is brilliant but overall I prefer the possibly more simplistic but all also much more immersive Platoon. Great write up Sam!
I too prefer the “immersive” PLATOON. Certainly a bit more simplistic.
Great review, Sam. It has been years since I saw this movie, but I remember being quite impressed with it. I really ought to give it another watch someday.
Definitely worth re-watching – I plan to do so myself soon.